Dipak Rangnath More v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

86-APEAL-336-2025 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 336 OF 2025 Dipak Rangnath More .... Appellant

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr.

.... Respondents ----- Ms. Deepti Thorat, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. K. C. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State. Mr. Hrishikesh Giri, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. Sharad L. Sonawane, Respondent No.2 - in person present. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date:

2025.04.25 15:15:58 +0530 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Appellant, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 2.

Mr. Hrishikesh Giri learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that he has instructions to appear in this matter on behalf of Respondent No.2, hence he seeks time.

3.

Learned counsel for the Appellant strongly objected to allow an adjournment on the ground that no interim relief is granted to the Appellant.

4.

Considering the submissions of all learned counsel, last Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2

86-APEAL-336-2025 (CR).doc chance is given to the Respondent No.2 to go on with the matter. On the next date, if Respondent No.2 fails to argue the matter, this Court would decide the matter on merit.

5.

On the last date, this Court had appointed Advocate from Legal Aid Panel to represent for Respondent No.2, her appearance is discharged.

6.

Stand over to 28th April, 2025.

( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2