Satish Ramrao Deshmane And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

88-APEAL-363-2025 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 363 OF 2025 Satish Ramrao Deshmane And Anr .

.... Appellants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.... Respondents ----- Mr. Shirish Gupte, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Ramesh Dube Patil, Mr. Ashish Gabhale, Mr. Devarat Hiray nd Adv. Iraa Dube Patil i/b Jay & Co., Advocate for the Appellant.

Ms. P. P. Bhosale, APP, for the Respondent - State. Mr. Hrishikesh Giri, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. Sharad L. Sonawane, Respondent No.2 - in person present. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date:

2025.04.25 15:16:01 +0530 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Senior counsel for the Appellants, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 2.

Mr. Hrishikesh Giri, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that he has instructions to appear in this matter on behalf of Respondent No.2, hence he seeks time.

3.

Learned Senior Counsel for Appellants insisted for interim relief as Appellants have no concerned with the said matter. Learned senior counsel strongly objected to allow an adjournment on the Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2

88-APEAL-363-2025 (CR).doc ground that no interim relief is granted to the Appellants. 4.

Considering the submissions of all learned counsel, last chance is given to the Respondent No.2 to go on with the matter. On the next date, if Respondent No.2 fails to argue the matter, this Court would decide the matter on merit.

5.

On the last date, this Court had appointed Advocate from Legal Aid Panel to represent for Respondent No.2, her appearance is discharged.

6.

Stand over to 28th April, 2025.

( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2