Kailash Sadashiv Surve v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 66 apeal 448-25-cr.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.448 OF 2025 Kailash Sadashiv Surve ... Appellant Vs.

State of Maharashtra and anr.

... Respondents ------- Mr. Sudeep Pasbola, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ayush Pasbola, Mr. Sankalp Vichare, Ms. Mrunal Bhide and Mr. Rajan Gurnani, Advocates for the Appellant.

Mr. P. P. Deokar, APP for the State/the Respondent No.1. Mr. Rajendra Madhavi, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. ------- CORAM :

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

29 APRIL, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned senior counsel for the Appellant, learned APP and learned counsel for the First Informant/the Respondent No.2. 2.

Learned senior counsel for the Appellant submits that during pendency of this Bail Application before the Trial Court, the Appellant was on interim relief and thereafter, his Bail Application is rejected. 3.

Considering the fact that during hearing of the Bail Application, Appellant was on interim relief, the interim relief granted to the Appellant Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date:

2025.05.02 14:24:59 +0530 PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR be continued till the next date.

Priya R. Soparkar

2 66 apeal 448-25-cr.doc 4.

Learned counsel for the First Informant seeks time to file reply. 5.

At his request, stand over to 10th June, 2025. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Priya R. Soparkar