Prashant Tanaji Jadhav v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2-APEAL-519-2025 (CR).doc Harish

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 519 OF 2025 Prashant Tanaji Jadhav ...Appellant

Versus

State Of Maharashtra And Anr.

...Respondents

HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date:

2025.10.10 20:02:16 +0530 ------- Mr. Ishan Paradkar for the Appellant.

Ms. Veers Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Ahilya Nalawade for Respondent No. 2. (Appointed Through Legal Aid Committee).

API Ranjit Tippe, Miraj Rural Sangli.

------- CORAM :

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

8th OCTOBER, 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for the respondent State and learned counsel for respondent No.2 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind bar more than 6 year and 4 months. Yet, there is no progress in the trial, except the victim is in the witness box for recording of evidence.

3.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the 1/2

2-APEAL-519-2025 (CR).doc applicant, call the report from the concerned Judge why there is delay in trial when the applicant is behind bar more than 6 years and 4 months.

4.

Stand over to 7th November, 2025.

5.

Learned Registrar Judicial to inform the concerned Judge and call the report by next date.

[SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.] 2/2