Santosh @ Lubya Chintamani Chandilkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

903-APEAL-684-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.684 OF 2025 Santosh @ Lubya Chintamani Chandilkar Indian Inhabitant, Permanently residing at Village Jamb, Taluka : Indapur, Dist. : Pune and at present lodged in Yerwada Central Prison at Yerwada, Pune.

...Appellant by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date:

2025.09.19 18:49:22 +0530 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra (At the instance of Walchandnagar Police Station vide C.R. No.46 of 2013).

2.

Dada Shivaji Jadhav Hotel Mahalaxmi, Jambh, Taluka : Indapur, District : Pune - 413 106.

...Respondents

***** Mr.Subhash Jha a/w Mr.Siddharth Jha,Mr.Sumeet Upadhaya, Mr.Ashish Saxena, Mr.Chetan Gogawale i/b.

Mr.Rohit Rajaram Gujar - Law Global Advocates:- Advocates for Appellant.

Mr.Ashok S. Gawai:- APP for Respondent No.1-State.

Mr.Ghansham Jadhav:- Advocate for Respondent No.2.

*****

CORAM

:

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

17th SEPTEMBER 2025 P. C. :- 1.

For the reasons recorded separately, which are under typing, following order is passed:-

O R D E R

(i) The Appeal is allowed.

Satish Sangar 1/2

903-APEAL-684-2025.doc (ii) The order dated 20 th May 2024 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, District Pune in Atrocity Special Case No.34 of 2013 is set aside. (iii) The Appellant - Santosh @ Lubya Chintamani Chandilkar be released on bail on furnishing personal bond and surety bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) in connection with C.R. No.46 of 2013 registered with Walchandnagar, Taluka : Baramati, District : Pune for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 143, 147, 149, 120-B, 201 of IPC, under Section 3(2)(5) of SC & ST Act and Section 7(1)(d) of the Protection of Civil Rights Act.

(iv) Bail be furnished before the Special Court at Indapur, District : Pune.

(v) The Appellant is directed not to enter the Pune District and Malshiras Taluka of District Solapur till the conclusion of the trial.

(vi) For attending Indapur Court on dates, he is permitted to enter Pune District.

(vii) He is directed to furnish his alternate address to the Police and to the Court.

(viii) The Appellant is directed not to threaten the prosecution witnesses or to allure them in any manner.

(ix) In case of breach of the conditions, liberty to apply for cancellation of bail.

2.

In view of the above terms, the Appeal is disposed of. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2