Mohan Fakira Jadhav v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

32-APEAL-831-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.831 OF 2025 by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date:

2025.10.09 18:51:18 +0530 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Mohan Fakira Jadhav ...Appellant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

***** Mr.Shrirang Katneshwarkar a/w Mr.Sandeep Gupta:- Advocates for Appellant.

Mr.Ashok S. Gawai:- APP for Respondent No.1-State.

Mr.Tejas Kothalikar:- Advocate for Respondent No.2.

*****

CORAM

:

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

1st OCTOBER 2025 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant and learned APP and learned Advocate for the First-Informant.

2.

After hearing them and after going through the papers, when this Court is not inclined to allow the Appeal, learned Advocate seeks liberty to withdraw the Appeal. Even though the First-Informant, son of the deceased has filed "No objection" to grant bail, after considering the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail. Satish Sangar 1/2

32-APEAL-831-2025.doc 3.

The Appellant seeks liberty to withdraw. It is disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty to prefer an Appeal after a period of three (3) months.

4.

In view of the above liberty, if the Appeal is filed, delay will have to be condoned.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2