Naushad Jamir Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

12.APEAL.939.2025 Arjun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 939 OF 2025 Parshuram Yallappa Kakshagiri ...Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra And Anr

...Respondents

Mr. Shailesh Chavan a/w Sachin Pawar, for the Appellant Mr. Nikhil Kamble, for the Respondent No. 2 Mr. Rishikesh Pethe, APP for the Respondent - State. API. Sudhir Kadam, Paud Police Station, is present.

CORAM:

R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATED:

17th JANUARY, 2026.

PC:- 1.

Mr. Chavan, Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant is heard for some time.

2.

Mr. Pethe, Learned A.P.P. has drawn attention of the Court to the evidence indicating that the Appellant herein is identified by the Informant as well as injured witness in the identification parade.

3.

At this stage, Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks time to make further submissions since the memorandum 17th January, 2026.

12.APEAL.939.2025 Panchanama of the Identification Parade is provided to him just now.

4.

At his request, stand over to 30th January, 2026. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) { 17th January, 2026.