Sahil Ramesh Sonavane v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

46-APEAL-951-2025.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 951 OF 2025 Sahil Ramesh Sonavane ...Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Anr

...Respondents

Mr Ashish Ingle (appeared online), with Dayavant Gaikwad, for the Appellant.

Mr HJ Dedhia, APP, for Respondent No. 1-State.

CORAM:

R. M. JOSHI, J.

SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE DATED:

17TH FEBRUARY 2026 PC:- SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2026.02.17 17:59:04 +0530 1.

Learned APP has submitted that the present Appeal has become infructuous in view of the Anticipatory Bail being rejected by the Special Court, learned counsel for the Appellant has raised the issue as to whether any ad-interim relief could be granted by the Court without hearing the informant in a Bail Application. Though the Appeal does not survive, since this issue has been raised and this Court is called upon to render finding thereon, the issue is taken up for hearing. Counsel for the Appellant is heard. 2.

Reserved for order on the issue sought to be argued. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) {