Pradeep Santosh Pawar v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

84-APEAL-1200 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1200 OF 2025 Pradeep Santosh Pawar ...Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

**** Mr. Shubham S. Sane h/f Ms. Seema Dighe for the Appellant. Mr. Kade i/b Janhavi Kau Karnik for Respondent No.2 Mr. M.S. Sonawane APP for the State.

**** CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.

DATE :

10th March, 2026 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the APP seeks time to make statement with regard to the examination of the informant before the Trial Court. 2.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant has brought to notice of this court dated 07th March, 2026 wherein, prima-facie, view was expressed that this is a fit case for applying parity and grant of bail to the appellant.

3.

It is only on request from learned APP that let the informant be examined before the Trial Court, the order of bail was not passed. It Navnath Waghmare (P.A.)

84-APEAL-1200 OF 2025.doc needs to be mention that such statement cannot be allowed to be made just for the sake of seeking adjournment.

4.

Time granted as last chance.

5.

Learned counsel for the APP seeks time.

6.

At his request, stand over to 16th March, 2026. (R.M. JOSHI, J.) Navnath Waghmare (P.A.)