← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/337/2025rule absolute

Viraj S/O Suhas Patil v. State Of Maha Thr Director General Of Police, And Others.

2026-04-08Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'Ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta1 pages

(1) 16wp337.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.337/2025 Viraj Suhas Patil .Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Akshay Naik, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. K. S. Motwani, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S. S. Doifode, A.P.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Ms Bhavya C. Dhruv, Advocate for respondent No.9. Mr. K. R. Bhise, Advocate for respondent No.10. Mr. Shyam Jaiswal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 11 and 12. CORAM :

ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.

DATE :

APRIL 8, 2026.

Remark of the Registry shows that respondent Nos.13 and 14 are not yet served.

2.

Mr. Akshay Naik, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner submits that these respondents are in jail. The petitioners made an attempt to serve them through private mode. However, they refused to accept the service. Superintendent of Jail has issued a communication to that effect, which includes the respondents' acknowledgment that they do not want to receive the copy of petition. He submits that affidavit of service will be filed within two working days. Be filed.

3.

Registry shall go through the affidavit and examine whether notice is served to these respondents. List thereafter. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kahale