The State Of Maharashtra v. Dashrath Prabhakar More And Others

929-Criappeal-398-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 929 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 398 OF 2025 The State Of Maharashtra

VERSUS

Dashrath Prabhakar More And Another .....

WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2025 WITH APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL BY STATE NO. 82 OF 2025 ....

Ms. M. L. Sangit, APP for the Appellant - State Mr. Amit A. Mukhedkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr. D. S. Kudle, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in ALP No.82/2025 ....

CORAM

:

NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

DATE :

16.12.2025 PER COURT :

1.

This is Appeal for enhancement of sentence by the State and there is Appeal by the Convict.

2.

This Court had appointed Advocate Mr. Amit A. Mukhedkar for the Victim in the Appeal against enhancement of sentence. 3.

The learned APP tenders across the bar a copy of communication received by her from the concerned Police Station that, the Victim has been telephonically informed of the matters.

4.

Hence, this Court appoints the learned Advocate Mr. Amit A. Mukhedkar for the Victim in the Appeal against conviction.

929-Criappeal-398-2025.odt 5.

The learned Advocate Mr. Kudle appears for Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in the Appeal for enhancement by the State.

6.

None for the Appellant in the Appeal against conviction. 7.

The order dated 02/12/2025 show that, the Respondent Nos.1 and 2, i.e. Dashrath and Bharat, in the Appeal for enhancement of sentence has been served. However, none appears for them.

8.

Stand over after four [04] weeks.

[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/December-2025