← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/976/2025application allowed

Govind Rajkumar Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025-06-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker4 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:15418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 979 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 976 OF 2025 GOVIND RAJKUMAR KAMBLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for the applicant : Mr.S.P.Katneshwarkar APP for Respondent-State : Mrs.P.V.Diggikar ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 19.06.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicant is seeking bail as he is arrested on 09.04.2025 in connection with Crime No.282/2025, registered with MIDC Police Station, Latur, for the offence punishable under Section 309 (6), 118 (1), 352, 351 (1), 3

(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3] It is the case of the prosecution that on 06.04.2025 at about 9.30 p.m. the applicant along with coaccused came at the pan stall of the informant, gave order of pan and betel nut and ate pan and betel nut. Thereafter, they were leaving the spot without making payment. The informant asked for payment, accused persons assaulted the

informant and his brother. It is further alleged that the applicant has taken away the amount of Rs.5,000/- from the cash box. As such, the FIR is registered. 4] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is arrested on 09.04.2025 and that the role of the applicant is identical to the role of the all other co-accused and all co-accused have been granted bail. 5] The learned APP has not disputed the fact that the other co-accused have been granted bail and there is no injury certificate.

6] All co-accused have been granted bail and the role of the applicant is identical to the role of the co-accused and the applicant is in custody from 09.04.2025. Considering the said fact, the applicant is granted bail. The application is allowed in the following terms : a] The applicant shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.282/2025, registered with MIDC Police Station, Latur, for the offence punishable under Section 309 (6), 118 (1), 352, 351 (1), 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

b] The applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of concerned Police Station till the filing of the charge sheet.

c] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall not contact the informant, in any manner whatsoever, during the pendency of the trial. d] The applicant shall co-operate with the trial Court and he shall attend each and every date, unless exempted by the trial Court.

e] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution and he shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

f] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall place on record of the trial Court the details of his Contact Number and residential address with updates in case of any change.

7] Needless to say, in case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled. It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present bail application. The concerned Court shall

proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

8] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC