Yunusbaig Haji Baig Inamdar v. The State Of Maharashtra
2025:BHC-AUG:16139
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 986 OF 2025 YUNUSBAIG HAJI BAIG INAMDAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pravin B. Rakhunde APP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. P. Dawalkar ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 26.06.2025 P.C. :
1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
2] The applicant is seeking bail as he was arrested on 03.04.2025 in connection with Crime No.0355/2024, dated 28.12.2024, registered with Biloli Police Station, District Nanded, for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 469, 470, 472,474, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
3] It is the case against the applicant is that he has transferred the property jointly belong to the applicant and the informant to his own son. As such, FIR is registered against the accused persons including the present applicant, who is in jail from 03.04.2025.
4] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the son of the applicant is present in the court, who is already enlarged on regular bail by the learned JMFC, Biloli by order dated 05.04.2025, who has produced the Aadhaar Card, who is identified by the learned counsel for the applicant. An undertaking is also filed by the son of the applicant. On the basis of which, the learned counsel further submits that the applicant and son of the applicant would not alienate, transfer or create any third party interest over the property bearing Gut No.96, situated at Village Mutnyal, Taluka Biloli, District Nanded. 5] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is civil dispute pending, so also, he submits that the applicant, so also, his son would not create any third party interest in the property.
6] The investigation in the matter has substantially progressed. The evidence being documentary in nature, further custody of the applicant would not be necessary. 7] In view of the above, the application is allowed in the following terms :
a] The applicant shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.355/2024, dated 28.12.2024, registered with Biloli Police Station,
District Nanded, for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 469, 470, 472,474, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
b] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall not contact the informant, in any manner whatsoever, during the pendency of the trial. c] The applicant shall co-operate with the trial Court and he shall attend each and every date, unless exempted by the trial Court.
d] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution and he shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.
e] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall place on record of the trial Court the details of his Contact Number and residential address with updates in case of any change.
8] Needless to say, in case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled.
9] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present bail application. The concerned Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.
10] It is further clarified that the undertaking given in this court would not prejudice the informant from taking further measures in the matter before appropriate forum in accordance with law.
11] The application stands disposed of.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE marathe