Venkati Santram Dapkar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra
2025:BHC-AUG:16321
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1094 OF 2025 1] VENKATI SANTRAM DAPKAR 2] KESHAV BHAGWAN DAPKAR 3] MAHADEV SANTRAM DAPKAR 4] VIKAS MAHADEV DAPKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr.U.B.Bondar APP for Respondent-State : Mr.P.P.Dawalkar ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 27.06.2025 P.C. :
1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
2] The learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present application as regards applicant no.4, namely, Vikas Mahadev Dapkar, with liberty to file fresh bail application after filing of the charge sheet. Leave granted. The Bail Application as regards applicant no.4, namely, Vikas Mahadev Dapkar is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
3] The applicant nos.1 to 3 are seeking bail as they are arrested on 15.05.2025 and 16.05.2025 respectively, in
connection with Crime No.117/2025, registered with Dindrud Police Station, District Beed, for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 352 and 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
4] Considering that the injury caused to the Balasaheb is grievous in nature and the same is at the instance of the applicant no.4, so also, the injuries caused to the other injured are simple in nature and the same are at the instance of the applicant nos. 1 to 3, so also, there is cross FIRs. Considering this aspect of the matter and considering that the applicant nos.1 to 3 are in jail from 15.05.2025 and 16.05.2025 respectively and the investigation in the matter is complete, the applicant nos.1 to 3 are granted bail. In view of the same, the application as regards applicant nos. 1 to 3 is allowed in the following terms :
a] The applicant nos. 1 to 3 shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.117/2025, registered with Dindrud Police Station, District Beed, for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 352 and 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- each, with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
b] The applicant nos. 1 to 3, upon being released
on bail, shall not contact the informant, in any manner whatsoever, during the pendency of the trial. c] The applicant nos. 1 to 3 shall co-operate with the trial Court and they shall attend each and every date, unless exempted by the trial Court.
d] The applicant nos. 1 to 3 shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution and they shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.
e] The applicant nos. 1 to 3, upon being released on bail, shall place on record of the trial Court the details of their Contact Number and residential address with updates in case of any change.
5] Needless to say, in case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled. It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present bail application. The concerned Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.
6] The application stands disposed of.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC