Lakhansingh Mirshrilal Kushwagh v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

- 1 - ba1779.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1779 OF 2025 Lakhansingh Mirshrilal Kushwagh ....Applicant

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & another .....Respondents Mr. S. B. Madde, Advocate for Applicant.

Smt. R. R. Tandale, APP for the State.

Ms. A. V. Veer Naik, Advocate (appointed) for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 11th FEBRUARY, 2026.

PER COURT :

1.

After hearing the learned Counsel for the Applicant at length, when this Court was not inclined to consider the bail application, the learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Application.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

Bail Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4.

High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee at Aurangabad to pay the fees of the learned Counsel appointed on behalf of Respondent No. 2 as per rules.

(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) dyb