Revan Pramod Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2026:BHC-AUG:1571 :: 1 ::

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO.2368 OF 2025 Revan s/o Pramod Pawar ... APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT .......

Mr. A.K. Bhosle, Advocate for applicant Mr. P.P. Dawalkar, A.P.P. for respondent - State .......

CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2026 PER COURT :

1.

By this application, the applicant seeks his release on regular bail in connection with Crime No.221/2025, registered with Bhadgaon Police Station, District Jalgaon for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2.

The prosecution case in short is that, on 12/6/2025, at about 6.00 p.m. when the informant Trupti Revan Pawar was in the house of her mother, the applicant i.e. her husband came in a Car

:: 2 ::

bearing Registration No.MH-19/EP-8055 without any intimation and asked her to join him matrimonial home. The informant reported that as she was not feeling well, she will come with him on the next day, due to which the applicant became angry and abused her and her sister Priyadarshini and beaten them by fists and blows. The applicant told that if informant does not wish to come, she should not come and he will take away their daughter Gargi. However, informant stated that she will come along with Gargi to his house on the next day. On this, the applicant snatched Gargi to carry her to his house. When her mother and sister resisted the applicant from taking away Gargi, the applicant drove his car and rammed that car over her body, due to which the informant Trupti sustained grievous injury. Thereafter she was admitted to the hospital. 3.

The applicant was arrested on 16/6/2025 and, since then is in custody. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, the issue between the applicant and the informant is of matrimonial nature. The applicant had gone to bring the complainant to join his company to matrimonial house and the incident occurred. Learned counsel submits that, it is a case of over-implication. The The investigation is complete and charge sheet is filed. Nothing is to be recovered at the instance of the applicant Hence, prayed to allow

:: 3 ::

the application.

4.

Learned A.P.P. opposed the application submitting that the applicant assaulted the complainant and thereafter indulged into a severe and and the gravity of the offence can be gathered from the injury sustained by the victim. Hence prayed to reject the application.

5.

Considering the submissions of both sides, and perusal of the record, prima facie arising out of matrimonial discord and it is a case of over-implication. There are no antecedents against the applicant. Nevertheless, the investigation is complete for all intents and purposes. Therefore, in my considered opinion, indefinite incarceration of the applicant is unjustified. Thus, the application warrants consideration, and accordingly, the discretion deserves to be exercised in favour of the applicant. Hence the order :

O R D E R

(i) Bail Application is allowed.

(ii) The applicant Revan s/o Pramod Pawar be released on bail on furnishing P.B. and S.B. of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount in the above crime, on the conditions that :

:: 4 ::

(a) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

(b) The applicant shall remain present on each date, unless exempted by the trial Court.

(iii) Needless to state that, nothing stated hereinabove shall be construed as an expression on merits of the case. Learned Trial Court shall proceed independently and uninfluenced by the observations made hereinabove.

(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) fmp/-