Shaikh Mustaq Shaikh Amir And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2025 1.

Shaikh Mustaq Shaikh Amir 2.

Shaikh Asef Shaikh Amir ..

Applicants

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra, through Officer In-charge, Police Station Taluka Jalna, District Jalna.

2.

The Superintendent of Police, Jalna, District Jalna.

..

Respondents WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.117 OF 2025 1.

Shaikh Mustaq Shaikh Amir 2.

Shaikh Asef Shaikh Amir ..

Applicants

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra, through Officer In-charge, Police Station Taluka Jalna, District Jalna.

2.

The Superintendent of Police, Jalna, District Jalna.

..

Respondents ____________ Mr. S. S. Thombre h/f. Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke, advocate for the Applicants.

Mr. S. K. Shirse, APP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. ____________ CORAM :

ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :

05.02.2025 P.C.:- 1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicants have approached this Court apprehending arrest in connection with FIR No.0771/2024 dated 10.12.2024 registered with Taluka Jalna Police Station, District Jalna for the offences punishable under sections 420, 465, 467, 471 and 472 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3] The learned APP seeks time.

4] It is made clear that the interim protection is not granted on merits. The matter to be heard on merits on the next date. 5] In the meanwhile, there shall be interim order in the following terms :- A] Till the next date, in the event the applicants are arrested in connection with FIR No.0771/2024 dated 10.12.2024 registered with Taluka Jalna Police Station, District Jalna, the applicants shall be released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.

B] The applicants shall remain present before the investigating officer as and when required by the investigating officer.

C] The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation, including producing all documents in his possession, as may be demanded by the investigating officer. D] The applicants shall not influence the informant,

witnesses or any person concerned with the case and he shall not tamper with the evidence.

6] Needless to say, violation of any of the aforesaid conditions may result in this order being cancelled. 7] List on 12.02.2025. Interim protection granted today to continue till the next date only.

(ARUN R. PEDNEKER) JUDGE