Shaikh Mustaq Shaikh Amir And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

124.25ABA+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1002 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 124 OF 2025 SHAIKH MUSTAQ SHAIKH AMIR AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.S.S.Thombre h/f.Mr.S.J.Salunke APP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.A.A.Khan ...

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2025 ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 19.03.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent-State. 2] The learned counsel for the applicants submits that there are multiple N.A. permissions issued by the concerned Tahsil i.e. Jalna from the year 2006 onwards till 2009 and copies of the same are given to the learned APP. 3] The learned APP submits that the Tahsildar as well as Sub Divisional Officer had no authority to issue such certificates.

124.25ABA+ 4] Considering the submissions of the parties, the Collector, Jalna or any Superior Rank Revenue Officer to explain policy of issuance of N.A. permission in the area, so also, to explain as regards the N.A. permissions granted for the aforesaid period, particularly, whether these N.A. permissions have emanated from the Tahsil office or by the Sub Divisional Office or by any office of the Revenue Department.

5] List this matter on 02.04.2025.

6] Interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC