Vijay Alias Vijaykumar Subhash Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 793 OF 2025 VIJAY ALIAS VIJAYKUMAR SUBHASH RATHOD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Abhijeet V. Thombre APP for Respondent/State: Ms. Neha B. Kamble ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 09.05.2025 P.C. :

1] Issue notice to the respondents. The learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of both the respondents.

2] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

3] The applicant has approached this Court apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.4/2025, registered with Pimplalner Police Station, District Beed, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 316(5), 238, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, under Sections 3, 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

4] The learned counsel for the applicant relies upon the order passed by this court dated 11.03.2025 in ABA/207/2025. The learned counsel submits that the applicant's role cannot be higher than the one with the applicant in ABA/207/2025.

5] Considering the above, in the meanwhile, there shall be interim order in the following terms :- A] Till the next date, in the event the applicant is arrested in connection with Crime No.4/2025, registered with Pimplalner Police Station, District Beed, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 316(5), 238, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, under Sections 3, 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, he shall be released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.

B] The applicant shall remain present before the investigating officer as and when required by the investigating officer.

C] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation, including producing all documents in his possession, as may be demanded by the

investigating officer.

D] The applicant shall not influence the informant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case and he shall not tamper with the evidence.

6] Needless to say, violation of any of the aforesaid conditions may result in this order being cancelled. 7] List on 17.06.2025.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE marathe