Sachin Sarjerao Tribhuvan v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 940ABA2178.2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2178 OF 2025 Sachin Sarjerao Tribhuvan

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra ...

Mr. Datta Sundarrao Kale - Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar - APP for State ...

CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.

DATED : 13TH JANUARY, 2026 PER COURT : - 1.

After hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicant for some time, leave is sought to withdraw this Application with liberty to surrender before the Magistrate and to prefer a Regular Bail Application. 2.

Leave is granted.

3.

The Applicant is directed to surrender before the Magistrate on or before 27th January, 2026.

4.

In case the Applicant surrenders and prefers a Regular Bail Application, the Magistrate shall decide the same on its own merits. 5.

If the Applicant fails to surrender within the stipulated time, then Investigating Officer is at liberty to exercise his powers to arrest the Applicant.

6.

The Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

[HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] JUDGE SG Punde Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/01/2026 18:50:45