← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPR/272/2025disposed off

Shri. Piyush Sanjay Meshram v. Sau. Prashnnaki W/O Piyush Meshram

2026-02-13Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke2 pages

2026:BHC-NAG:2608 1 47-APPR-272-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 272 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 10991 OF 2025 SHRI PIYUSH SANJAY MESHRAM Vrs.

SAU. PRASHNNAKI W/O PIYUSH MESHRAM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri P. K. Bezalwar, Advocate for applicant.

CORAM: URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

DATE : 13/02/2026.

1.

By this application, the applicant is seeking condonation of delay which is caused in preferring the criminal revision application for challenging the order of maintenance.

2.

It is the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that the Family Court has issued notice. After receipt of notice, the applicant has engaged his counsel. Thereafter, by taking instructions and details, the counsel for the applicant has prepared and filed written statement on behalf of the applicant, but due to the ailment, he could not attend the proceedings. Applicant is suffering from heart ailment and angioplasty is already performed on him on 15/12/2021. In October, 2025, the applicant was served with the notice. Therefore, he contacted to his counsel and it revealed that the application is already disposed of. Due to his ailment, he could not attend the proceedings and therefore, he could not file revision also to challenge the said order and for this reason, he prays for condonation of delay.

2 47-APPR-272-2025.odt 3.

By the impugned order passed by the Family Court, the maintenance @ Rs.15,000/- p.m. was granted. Admittedly, applicant has not deposited amount towards the arrears of maintenance. The applicant has shown his willingness to deposit amount of Rs.1,00,000/- within 15 days.

4.

Considering the reasons mentioned in the application which is supported by the affidavit, there is reasonable and just cause for condonation of delay. At the same time, considering the arrears of maintenance are due against him to the tune of Rs.7,00,000/-. The applicant has shown his willingness to deposit the amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, therefore, the delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following order :-

ORDER

i] Delay of 153 days is condoned subject to applicant shall deposit the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- towards the arrears of maintenance within 15 days before this Court. ii] On depositing the amount of maintenance, criminal revision application be registered. On registration of criminal revision, notice be issued to the non-applicants. iii] The applicant is permitted to serve the non-applicant by all modes of service.

iv] Application is disposed of.

5.

Stand over to 07/05/2026.

[JUDGE] Choulwar Signed by: V.M. Choulwar (VMC) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 16/02/2026 14:45:44