← Library
Bombay High CourtREVW/1/2025disposed off

Maitreya Pratiniddhi And Guntavnukdar Sanghatna Nashik Through Shi Nilesh Sanjay Patil And ORS v. The Competent Authority (Mpid) And ORS

2026-02-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad3 pages

Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date:

2026.02.27 19:39:43 +0530 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO.21268 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6165 OF 2019 Competent Authority Deputy Collector MPID, Mumbai ....Petitioner

Versus

Laxmikant Shrikrushna Narvekar & Ors.

....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL REVIEW PETITION NO.1 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6165 OF 2019 Maitreya Pratiniddhi and Guntavnukdar Sanghatna Nashik and Ors.

....Petitioners

Versus

The Competent Authority MPID & Ors.

....Respondents ---- Mr. Manoj Kondekar a/w. Mr. Sanjay Nerurkar i/b. Mr. Kapil Dave for Respondent No.5/Original Writ Petition in WP/6165/2019. Mr. S.B. Bhatagunaki a/w. Advocate Jamkhandi, Ms. Urvi Joshi and Mr. Harshad Suman for the Review Petitioner in REVW/1/2025. Advocate Komal M. Gosavi a/w. Mr. Mohit Chordiya i/b. A and A Law, for the Intervenors in WP/6165/2019 and for Respondent No.5 in REVW/1/2025.

Mr. Milind Sathe, learned Advocate General a/w. Mr. S.V. Gavand, Addl. PP and Mr. Pradip Gharat, Special PP for the State / Review Petitioner in REVW(ST)/21268/2025.

Mr. Rahul Kamerkar a/w. Ms. Aparajita R. Jha, for Respondent No.2 in REVW(ST)/21268/2025 and for Respondent No.3 in REVW/1/2025.

Mr. Mahadeo Kirwale, Deputy Collector, Mr. Ravindra G. Shingade, Assistant Revenue Officer, Office of CA (Collector Office Mumbai City), representative present.

---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.

DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2026 P.C. :- 1.

In the first Review Petition, the remark of the Writ Section in the cause list, reads as under :

(For - Recall Order) Office Objection :

1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given.

2] About Maintainability. U/T. satisfy to Honourable Court.

Note :- 1) As per Order dt. 30/01/2026, Advocate for the petitioner has not supplied petition copy. Hence, notice could not be issued to non applicants / original petitioners. (Court D.B. for Order) "AT 05.00 PM", as per Order dt. 30/01/2026.

2.

In the second Review Petition, the remark of the Writ Section in the cause list, reads thus :

(For - Recall Order)

Office Objection :

1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given.

2] Name of applicant does not tally H.C. WP 6165/2019 - UT given.

3] How Maintainable.

4] Title not proper and title name not proper - UT given.

5] Review Petition in criminal no category - how Maintainable - UT Given (Court D.B. for Admission / Fresh) 3.

The Review Petitioners to take steps in the second Review Petition, within three weeks from today. 4.

Re-issue notice to the unserved non-Applicants, returnable on 27th March, 2026.

(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)