Samarth Krupa Developers And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

22 Apl-62-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2025 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2025 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 64 OF 2025 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr.

...Applicants Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

***** Jatin P. Karia (Shah) Advocate for the Applicants-later on M. A. Bastivi Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

20th AUGUST 2025 P. C. :- 1.

When the matter is called out, no one is present on behalf of the Applicants/convicted accused.

2.

There is direction to deposit 50% of the cheque amount. This by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2025.08.22 19:40:33 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/2

22 Apl-62-2025.doc Court on 21.01.2025 permitted the Applicant to deposit 20% instead of 50%. This order was passed only on hearing the Applicants. The Respondent No. 2 is not heard. They are aggrieved by the said direction.

3.

On the next date, if no one will appear on behalf of the Applicants, the Court will hear the contesting Respondent and decide the matter on the basis of the available materials. 4.

Stand over to 12th September 2025.

Later on 5.

Learned Advocate Shri Karia for the Applicants is appeared. 6.

Ad-interim order granted earlier to continue till the next date. 7.

Stand over to 12th September 2025.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2