Lance 1000 Global Private Limited Through Chandra Prakash Sahu v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Osk 22-Apl-584-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (A.P.L.) NO. 584 OF 2025 Lance 1000 Global Private Limited ... Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents _______________________________________ Mr. Vaibhav Rajam for Applicant.

Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Amrin Mujawar (Through V.C.) for Respondent No.2. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 9th July 2025.

P.C. :

1) It will not be out of way to place a fact on record that, to the queries put by this Court, the learned Advocate for Applicant was unable to answer.

2) Present Application is filed only by Applicant, i.e. Accused No.1, for quashing of the crime in question with the consent of Respondent No.2. 2.1) By now it is the settled position of law that, a crime cannot be quashed in part qua certain accused persons, even by consent of the informant. Reliance is placed in the case of Sunita Pankaj Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2024 ALL MR (Cri) 2945.

1/2

Osk 22-Apl-584-2025.doc 3) In view thereof and facing with the said legal difficulty, learned Advocate for Applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw Application unconditionally.

3.1) Leave granted.

4) Dismissed as withdrawn.

( RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date:

2025.07.14 11:32:47 +0530 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN 2/2