Mukesh Bhoormal Jain And ORS. v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2025.12.02 11:33:09 +0530 NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS 10-apl.659.2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.659 OF 2025 Mukesh Bhoormal Jain and Ors.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Prateek Datta a/w Mr. Vedant Rane i/b Mr. Amit Mehta for the Applicants Ms. Gauri S. Rao, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1 -State. Mr. Jitendra Mishra a/w Ms. Nishin Jain and Mr. Gautam Khobragade for the Respondent No.2.

PSI - V. S. Gawade from Gamdevi Police Station, Mumbai, is present. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 27th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C. :

1.

In view of the statement made by the learned A.P.P. that post the filing of the aforesaid application, charge-sheet has been filed and cognizance has been taken, learned counsel for the applicants, seeks leave to withdraw this application, with liberty to file a fresh petition/application seeking to challenge not only the FIR but also N. S. Chitnis 1/2

10-apl.659.2025.doc filing of the charge-sheet and cognizance taken. 2.

Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

3.

We make it clear, that we have not heard the aforesaid application on merits and as such all contentions of all parties on merits are kept open.

SANDESH D. PATIL, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

N. S. Chitnis 2/2