← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/943/2025disposed off

Vishal Prabhu Motwani v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2026-03-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe2 pages

Gitalaxmi 501-APL-943-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 943 OF 2025 Vishal Prabhu Motwani ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

__________ Mr. Jatin Sehgal, Devna Soni, Mr. Kunal Vaishnav, Mr. Yash Badkur & Mr. Rehaan Shaikh, learned Advocates for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer G. Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr. Kunal Chheda, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 2 is present in the Court.

__________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

6th MARCH 2026.

P.C. :

1.

This Criminal Application was mentioned today at 11.00 a.m. on the ground of urgency as mentioned in the praecipe dated 06.03.2026. The same is taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. In view of the urgency sought to be put forth by Mr. Jatin Sehgal, learned Advocate for the Applicant, circulation was granted post lunch.

2.

This matter was taken up after the "Fresh Admission Board". 3.

Heard Mr. Jatin Sehgal, learned Advocate for the Applicant, Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent and Mr. Kunal Chheda, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2. 4.

By the present Criminal Application, the Applicant has sought for the following substantive reliefs in terms of prayer clauses 21(a) & (b) :-

Gitalaxmi 501-APL-943-2025.doc "a.

allow the present Application and quash the summoning order dated 01.03.2025 passed by the Ld. Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai in C. R. 901 of 2024 titled as "Vakola Police Station vs Vishal Prabhu Motwani & Anr.";

b.

allow the present Application and quash any and all proceedings arising out of or in relation to C. R. 901 of 2024 titled as "Vakola Police Station vs Vishal Prabhu Motwani & Anr." pending before the Ld. Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 71st Court, Bandra, Mumbai."

5.

Mr. Jatin Sehgal, learned Advocate for the Applicant on instructions from the Applicant craves leave to withdraw the present Criminal Application in view of the settlement arrived between the parties during pendency of this Criminal Application. 6.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent does not object to the request of withdrawal of the present Criminal Application made by Mr. Jatin Sehgal on behalf of the Applicant.

7.

In view of the above, leave granted to withdraw the present Criminal Application.

8.

Criminal Application No. 943 of 2025 is disposed of as withdrawn.

[ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date:

2026.03.09 15:26:47 +0530 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR