Prithviraj Ramrao Adik v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

7-APL-1574-2025.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1574 OF 2025 Prithviraj Ramrao Adik ..Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Aditya Sawant, for the Applicant Mr. D. J. Haldankar, APP for the Respondent-State. PI - Aparna Vhatkar, Marine Line P. S.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

29th JANUARY 2026 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.

3.

Leave granted.

4.

The application stand dismissed as withdrawn. 5.

The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that, the observations in the impugned order may cause prejudice to the by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.01.30 21:51:02 +0530 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI first informant in other proceedings.

6.

Suffice to clarify that, the observations in the order granting or refusing to grant bail, are confined to decide the entitlement for bail, and do not bear upon the trial in the case, much less, upon the rights and liabilities of the parties in other proceedings.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH 1/1