Chhaya Baban Pawar And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra D

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI Date: 2026.01.17 18:55:35 +0530 GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 87 OF 2025 Seema Ghorpade And Anr.

... Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1590 OF 2025 Chhaya Baban Pawar And & Ors.

... Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent --- Mr. Yuvraj Tajane a/w Ms. Ashwini Mhetre, Advocates for Applicants in both Applications.

Ms. Iqra Qureshi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in both Applications.

Mr. Prasanna Malshe, APP for Respondent - State. Ms. Shrikishah Khnde - PSI, Hinjewadi Police Station, Pune. --- CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

16h JANUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

These Applications were circulated by Mr. Yuvraj Tajane, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on the grounds

mentioned in the praecipe dated 24th January, 2025. 2.

Today, the Applicants in both the Applications are present before this Court. Respondent No. 2 is said to be at an advance stage of pregnancy, as such is appearing through V. C. Ms. Iqra Qureshi, Advocate appearing for Respondent No. 2, identifies the Respondent No. 2. Similarly, the Applicants who are present in Court with their Advocate Mr. Yuvraj Tajane identify the Respondent No. 2 who appears through V. C.

3.

Mr. Yuvraj Tajane, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Ms. Iqra Qureshi, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2, jointly submit that the matrimonial dispute between the Applicant No. 2 (Sandeep Baban Pawar) in Criminal Application No. 1590 of 2025 and Respondent No. 2, is resolved. In view of the said resolution, Respondent No. 2 does not intend to pursue the criminal proceedings filed by her against the Applicants in these proceedings. Respondent No. 2, who is present on V. C., states that an affidavit to that effect would be sworn / affirmed and tendered in Court. Ms. Iqra Qureshi, learned Advocate for Respondent No.

2, states that she requires time till tomorrow for tendering the affidavit before the Court.

4.

The Applicants in both these Applications who are present in Court, who are identified by their Advocate Mr. Yuvraj Tajane, state that they have amicably settled the dispute with Respondent No. 2.

5.

Mr. Yuvraj Tajane, states that the presence of Applicant Nos.1 & 3 in Criminal Application No.1590 of 2025 and Applicants in Criminal Application No. 87 of 2025 be dispensed with and they may be permitted to appear through V. C. He undertakes to identify them on V. C. and also tender their ID cards duly verified before this Court. Respondent No. 2, Ms. Iqra Qureshi and the Mr. Prasanna Malshe learned APP do not object to the said request. As such, permission granted to the said Applicants, except Applicant Mr. Sandeep Baban Pawar (husband of Respondent No. 2), in these proceedings to appear through V. C. Mr. Sandeep Baban Pawar undertakes to remain present in person before this Court on 17th January, 2026.

6.

At the joint request of the parties, list the matter on 17th January, 2026.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)