Manikandan Ramkrishnan v. State Of Maharashtra

Digitally signed by DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date:

2025.03.25 18:32:39 +0530 DINESH SADANAND SHERLA 38-ba-2-25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2025 Manikandan Ramkrishnan ...Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent.

..............

Mr. Madhusudan Pareek, Appointed Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. C.D. Mali, APP for the Respondent/State.

..............

CORAM

:

N.R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

25.03.2025.

P.C. :

1.

This is an application for regular bail.

2.

The learned APP for the respondent/State submits that the trial has commenced and the prosecution has already examined four witnesses. It is thus submitted that present application, at this stage, may not be entertained.

3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail for 3 years. The incident was not per-meditated and therefore, the applicant may be released on bail.

4.

Considering the fact that the trial has commenced, at this stage, I am not inclined to entertain the present application. Hence, the Application is rejected. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to file fresh bail application, if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months.

[N.R.BORKAR, J.] Dinesh S. Sherla 1/1