Nilesh @ Sonu Dadu Ahire v. State Of Maharashtra

Shubhada S Kadam 40-BA-399-2025 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 399 OF 2025 Nilesh @ Sonu Dadu Ahire ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, APP for Respondent -State. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 12th FEBRUARY, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for respondent-State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in spite of directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court to expedite the trial, the Trial Court is not expediting the trial. Hence, requested to pass appropriate orders. 3.

Learned APP submits that, as per his instructions, charge has been framed against the applicant.

4.

Considering the submissions of both learned counsel as well as order dated 15th March 2024 passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Trial Court shall consider the observations of the Hon'ble Apex Court and SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM expedite the trial. The application stands disposed of. SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2025.02.13 15:57:57 +0530 1/2

Shubhada S Kadam 40-BA-399-2025 (CR).doc 5.

The applicant shall not file any application which may cause delay in the trial.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 2/2