Suraj S/O Rajkumar Wasekar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Girad, Tah. Samudrapur, Dist. Wardha

Digitally signed by DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date:

2025.04.15 14:40:25 +0530 1031-ba-773-25.doc DINESH SADANAND SHERLA lIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 773 OF 2025 Dhananjay R. Bhosale ...Applicant V/s.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent.

..............

Mr. Rahul S. Kate for the Applicant.

Mr. C.D. Mali, APP for the Respondent/State.

..............

CORAM

:

N.R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

03.03.2025.

P.C. :

1.

This is an application for regular bail.

2.

The applicant came to be arrested in Crime No. 275 of 2024 registered at Daund Police Station, Pune Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 324, 323,504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act.

3.

The present applicant is accused No.6 in the aforesaid crime. There was matrimonial dispute between accused No.2 and his wife and they were residing separately. According to the prosecution, the accused No.2 was annoyed with the complainant, as according to him the complainant was responsible for their separation. It is alleged that thus on the date of incident which took place on 7.4.2024, the present applicant and other co-accused assaulted the complainant, his wife and son by iron rod and wooden stick and attempted to commit their murder.

Dinesh S. Sherla 1/2

1031-ba-773-25.doc 4.

I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent - State.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing do with the alleged crime. It is submitted that the witnesses have not attributed any specific overt-act to the applicant. It is submitted that the applicant is in jail for 10 months and there are no other criminal antecedents. 6.

On the other hand, learned APP for the respondent/State submits that considering the nature of offence the applicant may not be released on bail.

7.

I have perused the statement of witnesses. They have not attributed any specific overt-act to the applicant. The motive for alleged crime is attributed to accused No.2. There are no other criminal antecedents against the applicant. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. In the result, the following order is passed.

O R D E R

A] The Application is allowed.

B] The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No. 275 of 2024 registered at Daund Police Station, Pune Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 324, 323,504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act on furnishing P.R Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

[N.R.BORKAR, J.] Dinesh S. Sherla 2/2