Dalit Sukhdeo Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ps, Andhera, Dist. Buldhana

11-BA-842-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 842 OF 2025 Aniket @ Andy Devidas Kamble ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

__________ Ms. Drishti Madhani a/w Mr. Anurag Ramekar i/b Mr. Sushant Jagadish Tayadde, learned Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

17th JUNE 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Ms. Drishti Madhani, learned Advocate for the Applicant. She points out to the order dated 3rd March 2025, by which the Respondent had sought time to file Affidavit-in-Reply. She submits that till date the reply is not filed. 2.

Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. appears for the State/Respondent and prays for extension of time to file reply. Ms. Drishti Madhani, learned Advocate does not object to the said request.

3.

Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. states that the reply will be filed within a period of two weeks from today. She further states that a advance copy would be served on the learned Advocate for the Applicant.

Gitalaxmi

11-BA-842-2025.doc 4.

At the request of Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 23rd July 2025. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date:

2025.06.17 21:11:14 +0530 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Gitalaxmi