Nitin Mahadu Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Pali Police Station

17-BA-864-2025.doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 864 OF 2025 Nitin Mahadu Patil ... Applicant

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra Through Pali Police Station ... Respondent ____________________________________________________________ Mr.Mahesh Vishwakarma, for the Applicant.

Mr.M.G. Patil, APP for Respondent-State.

Ms.Aneesa Cheema, for Respondent No.2.

by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.03.11 11:55:09 +0530 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE ____________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 10th MARCH 2026 P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned APP and learned counsel for Respondent No.2.

2.

The learned counsel for the Applicant submit that Applicant is behind bars more than five years. Yet trial has not concluded. 3.

The learned APP submitted that trial is in progress and six witnesses have been examined. The prosecution will try to conclude the trial as early as possible.

4.

Considering the submission of learned APP, the learned counsel

17-BA-864-2025.doc N.S.Kamble for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Application with liberty to file fresh Application, if there is no substantive progress in the trial after six months.

5.

Considering the submission of both learned counsel, Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 6.

All contention of the Applicant are kept open. 7.

All pending Applications are disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)