Shadab Farooque Shaikh v. Union Of India And ANR.

916_BA_946_2025.docx Prasad Rajput IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 946 OF 2025 Shadab Farooque Shaikh .. Applicant

Versus

Union of India and Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Anil G. Lalla a/w Ms. Rithika Yerra and Ms. Sana Shaikh, Advocates for Applicant.

 Ms. Sairuchita Chowdhary h/f Ms. Manisha Jagtap, SPP for Respondent No.1 - NCB.

 Mr. Dinesh J. Haldankar, APP for State.

...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : APRIL 25, 2025 P. C.

:

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned Prosecutor Ms.Jagtap is unwell due to a throat infection as informed by the holding Advocate. Hence Application is kept for hearing on Monday. Prosecution shall make alternate arragement if Ms. Jagtap is unwell.

3.

It is seen that order dated 06.03.2025 has also not been complied with which is a very serious issue noted by the Court. Learned Prosecutor is directed to comply with the directions given in the order dated 06.03.2025. It is clarified that no further time shall be granted to the prosecution for filing the Affidavit-in-Reply and matter will be heard.

916_BA_946_2025.docx 4.

Stand over to 28th April, 2025 (F.O.B.).

P.R. Rajput [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]