Tousif @ Tippu Mansur Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra

5-BA-1026-2025.doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1026 OF 2025 Tousif @ Tippu Mansur Shaikh ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent/s ________________________________________________________ Mr.Aniket Vagal, for the Applicant.

Mr.P.P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State.

Mr.Mateen Shaikh, for the Intervenor.

by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date:

2026.02.02 15:56:32 +0530 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE ________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 30th JANUARY, 2026 P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned APP for the Respondent-State and learned counsel for the Intervenor. 2.

The learned counsel for the Applicant submit that the Applicant is behind bars for more than five years and three months. Yet charge has not been framed against him.

3.

Call report from concerned Judge why the charge has not been framed against the Applicant.

5-BA-1026-2025.doc N.S.Kamble 4.

The Registrar Judicial to communicate this order to concerned Judge and call report.

5.

Stand over to 16th February 2025.

6.

The Registry to mention the name of the Mr.Matin Shaikh, Advocate appearing for the Intervenor on daily board. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)