Sapna @ Jayshree Ravi Wadibhasme v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso Of Ps Parseoni, Nagpur
ba1044.2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.1044/2025 (Sapna @ Jayshree Ravi Wadibhasme Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer of Police Station Parseoni, Nagpur) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.R. Rawlani, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. T.H. Udeshi, A.P.P. for the non-applicant/State. CORAM: MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATED: 3.12.2025.
The applicant has filed this second bail application on the ground of delay in trial.
2.
The applicant is in jail since 27.10.2021 in Crime No.253/2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120-B and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3.
The applicant is accused No.4. The applicant is arraigned as accused on the basis of voice record.
4.
The learned Advocate for the applicant has stated that the report of voice record is received and the result is inconclusive. Now though the trial is initiated and 7 witnesses are examined there is no substantial progress in the trial.
5.
The status report was called.
6.
The learned Advocate for the applicant has relied on the judgment passed by this Court in Criminal Bail Application No.1214/2024 (Kunal Rajesh Naik V/s. State of Maharashtra) wherein even after initiation of trial considering the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court this Court has granted bail to the applicant. 7.
After going through the status report it appears that though 7 witnesses are examined the concerned Court has stated that even
ba1044.2025.odt after a direction was given to the learned A.P.P. to furnish the list of witnesses, learned A.P.P. has not submitted the same saying that the offence is serious.
8.
It appears that the learned A.P.P. in said trial is not cooperating to conclude the trial and not calling the witnesses. The applicant is in jail since last 3 years. Considering the role of the applicant and as the voice report is inconclusive the applicant is released on bail. i) Applicant - Sapna @ Jayshree Ravi Wadibhasme be released on bail Crime No.253/2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120-B and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with solvent surety in the like amount before the trial Court.
ii) The applicant shall not in any way tamper with the prosecution evidence.
iii) The applicant shall not pressurize or threaten the prosecution witnesses iv) The applicant shall co-operate with the learned trial Judge in the conduct of the trial.
v) The applicant to attend the police station as and when called by the Investigating Officer.
9.
The Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.) Tambaskar.
Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 03/12/2025 18:03:56