Ram Pralhad Rathod v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso, Dhamangaon Bade Ps Dist. Buldhana

2026:BHC-NAG:2303 20-Cr.BA-1350-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION [B.A.] NO. 1350 OF 2025 Ram Pralhad Rathod -- VERSUS -- State of Maharashtra and Another __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.G. Mate, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant No.1/State. Ms. V.A. Warade, Advocate (appointed) for the Non-applicant No.2.

CORAM :

M.M. NERLIKAR, J.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 11, 2026.

The status report shows that, till this date, five prosecution witnesses are examined. The prosecution wants to examine the doctors, DNA experts and Investigation Officers as prosecution witnesses and to that effect learned Special A.P.P. has filed a Pursis.

2.

Considering this fact, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application and prayed to direct the trial Court to conclude the trial within three months.

3.

Considering the fact that the trial is at the fag end, the trial Court is requested to conclude the trial within three months.

20-Cr.BA-1350-2025 3.

In this view of the matter, the Criminal Application is disposed of as withdrawn. In case, the trial is not concluded within three months, the applicant is at liberty to approach this Court once again by filing a fresh bail application.

4.

Fees of the appointed counsel be quantified and paid as per rules.

[ M.M. NERLIKAR, J ] Piyush Mahajan