Satish @ Pandu Anna S/O Suresh Naidu v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Sitabuldi, Nagpur

2026:BHC-NAG:2900 Order 180226ba1378.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION [BA] NO. 1378 OF 2025.

Satish @ Pandu Anna Suresh Naidu.

-VERSUSState of Maharashtra.

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri S.D. Chande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri D.V. Chvhan, Sr.Advocate/P.P. with Ms P. Bawankule, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant.

CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2026.

Heard.

2.

The learned Senior Counsel and Public prosecutor Shri Chavhan, makes a statement that 16 witnesses are already examined, and only 14 witnesses are to be examined. He states that the statement is made on the basis of instructions from the Special P.P., who is conducting the trial. 3.

In view of this, the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the Rgd.

Order 180226ba1378.25 application with liberty to file fresh application before the trial Court, in case the trial is not concluded within a period of 6 months.

4.

Permission granted.

Criminal Application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought for.

5.

The Trial Court is requested to conclude the trial within a period of 6 months.

6.

Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to inform the concern Court about passing of this order.

JUDGE Signed by: R.G. Dhuriya (RGD) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/02/2026 11:10:10 Rgd.