Kalpesh Shashikant Kakkad v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Jaripatka , Nagpur

18.BA.1450.2025.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1450 OF 2025 Ankesh Rajendra Gupta .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................

 Mr. S. K. Kamble a/w. Mr. Rohidas Bhor and Ms. Manisha Jadhav, Advocates for Applicant.

 Ms. Shilpa K. Gajare - Dhumal, APP for Respondent.  API - J. S. Vhanmane, Mumbra Police Station, Thane. ...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : APRIL 09, 2025 P.C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Kamble, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Gajare - Dhumal, learned APP for Respondent.

2.

One of the grievance expressed by Mr. Kamble is that trial has been stalled for past six months despite having commenced and in that view of the matter incarceration of Applicant for 3 years and 7 months be considered by the Court for grant of bail. 3.

Prima facie, it is seen that there are two Accused persons in the matter but role of co-accused who has been enlarged on bail is far more lesser than Applicant before me.

4.

Learned APP would persuade me to consider gravity of crime and heinousness in which crime was committed for consideration of Bail Application.

18.BA.1450.2025.doc 5.

Learned APP is directed to apprise precise status of trial as on today and precise role of Applicant to enable the Court to consider the Bail Application of Applicant.

6.

Stand over to 18th June, 2025.

H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date:

2025.04.09 14:26:52 +0530 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT