Rimram Gobariya Ramavat v. The State Of Maharashtra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1475 OF 2025 Rimram Gobariya Ramavat ...
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Prasad A. Kamthe a/w. Mr. Ramesh K. Rathod, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. M.G.Patil, APP for the Respondent-State.
PS - Valmik More, Hinjewadi Police Station, Pimpri Chinchwad, Pune, present.
_________________________________________________________________ by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:
2026.01.29 12:14:34 +0700 SONALI SATISH KILAJE
CORAM
: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2026.
P.C. :
1.
By this application, the Applicant is seeking regular bail in C.R.No. 14 of 2024 registered with Hinjewadi Police Station, Pune, for the offences punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "IPC").
2.
It is prosecution's case that on 03.01.2024, at around 2 p.m., the applicant on the ground of land dispute assaulted the deceased and his elder brother with wooden stick and murdered him. It is alleged that after assault the deceased was lying in injured condition but the applicant did not provide any medical help. Due to said injuries, he died. 3.
It is contention of learned counsel for the applicant that the
applicant is behind bars for more than two years. There is no progress in the trial. The prosecution's case is based on circumstantial evidence. The applicant had no intention to kill the deceased. The applicant has no antecedents and requested to allow the application. 4.
It is contention of learned APP that the applicant assaulted the deceased with wooden stick on account of land dispute. There are witnesses who had last seen the applicant with the deceased. There is extra judicial confession of the applicant about the crime. If the applicant is released on bail, he may abscond or threaten prosecution witnesses and requested to reject the application.
5.
I have heard both the learned counsel. Perused chargesheet and documents produced on record. The applicant is behind bars for more than two years. There is no progress in the trial. The applicant has no antecedents. It may take time to conclude the trial. Considering these facts, I pass following order.
ORDER
(i) The applicant be enlarged on bail in C.R.No. 14 of 2024 registered with Hinjewadi Police Station, Pune, on executing P.R.Bond of Rs. 30,000/- on furnishing one or two sureties in the like amount.
(ii) The applicant shall attend the concerned police
station as and when required.
(iii) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case.
6.
The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of. All pending applications, if any, disposed of. 7.
It is made clear that the above observations are made only for the purpose of granting bail and the Trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in this order.
8.
All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)