Maria Remmy Mushi v. Union Of India And ANR

20-BA-1626-2025.DOC Ajit Pathrikar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1626 of 2025 Maria Remmy Mushi ...Applicant

Versus

Union of India and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Khushal Parmar a/w Anjali More and Sumant More, for the Applicant.

Mr. Rushikesh Munde, SPP for the UOI-Respondent No.1. Ms. Manisha Tidke, APP for the State-Respondent No.2.

CORAM

Dr. Neela Gokhale, J.

DATED:

26th November 2025 PC:- 1.

Mr. Rushikesh Munde, learned SPP, has tendered his affidavit in reply. The same is taken on record. 2.

After arguing the matter for some time, when I was not inclined to grant relief to the Applicant, Mr. Khushal Parmar, learned Counsel for the Applicant, sought permission to withdraw the present Bail Application.

3.

Permission to withdraw is granted.

26th November 2025

20-BA-1626-2025.DOC 4.

Mr. Munde, on instructions, stated that the charges are framed and the examination-in-chief of one witness is over and the cross-examination of the said witness remains. In all there are 14 witnesses which the prosecution intends to examine. Since the recording of evidence has already commenced, the Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and preferably conclude the same within a period of one year. 5.

The present Bail Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J) 26th November 2025