← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/1670/2025disposed off

Faizal Ejaj Khan v. Union Of India And ANR

2026-05-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi2 pages

903-BA-1768-2025 W BA-1670-2025 W BA-1725-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1768 OF 2025 Abhinav Atul Chaturvedi ...Applicant

Versus

Union Of India And Anr.

...Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1670 OF 2025 Faizal Ejaj Khan ...Applicant

Versus

Union Of India And Anr.

...Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1725 OF 2025 Rishabh Satish Sharma ...Applicant

Versus

Union Of India And Anr.

...Respondents

Mrs. Munira Palanpurwala Anand Mishra i/by Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi, for the Applicant in B.A. No. 1768/2025 and B.A. No. 1670/2025.

Mr. Dilip Mishra i/by Mr. Ayaz Khan, for the Applicant in B.A. No. 1725/2025.

Ms. Geeta Nayyar, Special P. P., for the Respondent No.1 UOI. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP, for the Respondent No. - State.

CORAM:

R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATED:

7th May, 2026 PC:- 1.

Yesterday all these three applications were heard. During the course of hearing, it was informed to this court that in all three cases grounds of arrest are not furnished. This Court 7th May 2026

903-BA-1768-2025 W BA-1670-2025 W BA-1725-2025 therefore has shown its inclination to allow all these three applications. However when this Court went through the record, it was revealed that grounds of arrest were duly communicated to the Applicant in B.A. No. 1768 of 2025. Since the bail was sought only on the basis of non providing of the grounds of arrest and as it is revealed that the said grounds may not be available for the said Applicant, this Court thought it appropriate to place all three matter together for hearing again. 2.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant in B.A. No. 1768 of 2025 argued on merit.

3.

Learned Special P. P. though made submission, she seek time to make further submission.

4.

At her request, stand over to 8th May 2026.

(R. M. JOSHI, J.) VDMokal/- 7th May 2026