Sandhya W/O Santosh Shende v. State Of Maharashtra

31-BA-1690-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI Date:

2025.08.18 15:19:38 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1690 OF 2025 Sandhya W/O Santosh Shende ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent **** Mr. Surendra Kumar Choudhari i/b Kshitija Wadatkar & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP for Respondent/State.

**** CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

14th AUGUST, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Surendra Choudhari, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, learned APP for the State. 2.

By the present Application, Applicant is seeking bail in Crime No. 33 of 2025 registered with Narayangaon Police Station, Pune. Said crime was registered as RCC No.110 of 2025 and tried by the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Junnar 3.

Mr. Surendra Choudhari, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, learned APP for the State submit that the Applicant has been convicted in RCC No.110 of 2025. They submit that the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Junnar, vide order dated 22nd May, 2025, has awarded conviction to the Applicant. They therefore submit that the present Bail Application has been rendered infructuous. Gayatri Shimpi

31-BA-1690-2025.doc 4.

In view of the statement made by Mr. Surendra Choudhari, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, learned APP for the State, the present Application is dismissed as infructuous. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Gayatri Shimpi