Suraj Santosh Bondhare v. The State Of Maharashtra

Mamta Kale 36-ba-1864-2025.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Bail Application No. 1864 of 2025 Suraj Santosh Bondhare ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

---- Mr Akshay Dingale i/b Vivek Arote, for the Applicant. Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for Respondent / State.

Ms Jahnavi Karnik, Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. PSI S K Borkar, Chakan Police Station, Pune, is present. ---- Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2025.09.16 17:17:02 +0530 MAMTA AMAR KALE Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.

Date: 16 September 2025 P.C.:

.

The learned APP apprises the Court that notice has been served upon respondent No.2 and she seeks legal aid assistance. 2.

Ms Jahnavi Karnik, who is present in the Court, is appointed as Advocate to espouse the cause of respondent No.2. Legal fees to be paid by the High Court Legal Service Committee. The applicant to furnish a copy of the application and other relevant papers, including the impugned judgment to the Advocate so appointed.

3.

By consent, stand over to 6 October 2025.

(R.N. Laddha, J.) __________________________________________________ 16 September 2025