Samadhan Lavate v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

86-BA-2143-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2143 OF 2025 Mr. Samadhan Lavate ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

__________ Ms. Surbhi Agrawal, learned Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Vinod Chate, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

17th JUNE 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Ms. Surbhi Agrawal, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Vinod Chate, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

2.

Ms. Surbhi Agrawal, learned Advocate for the Applicant points out at Page No. 95 of the paper-book and states that the forensic report, which is crucial to the case of Applicant, is said to be awaited.

3.

Mr. Vinod Chate, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent submits that the forensic report may take another two weeks' time. He states that endevour would be made to obtain the said forensic report within a period of two weeks from today. Gitalaxmi

86-BA-2143-2025.doc 4.

At the request of Mr. Vinod Chate, learned A.P.P. and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 2nd July 2025. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.06.17 21:12:31 +0530 Gitalaxmi