Dilipkumar Laxminarayan Yadav v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

31_BA_2359_2025.DOC Prasad

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2359 OF 2025 Dilipkumar Laxminarayan Yadav ...Applicant

Versus

State Of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Pawan Mali, for the Applicant.

Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM:

R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATED:

25th MARCH, 2026.

PC:- 1.

Counsel for Respondent No.2 is absent.

2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that even on the previous occasion, the bail application could not be heard on account of absence of appointed counsel. In order to ensure that the application is herd on the next date, Ms. Samiksha Pawar, is appointed to represent Respondent No.2.

3.

A copy of Bail Application be given to the appointed advocate.

4.

Stand over to 6th April, 2026.

(R. M. JOSHI, J.) { 25th March, 2026.