Haider Javed Sayyad @ Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra

904-BA-2599-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2599 OF 2025 Haider Javed Sayyad @ Shaikh ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

__________ Ms. Savvy Kolhekar i/b Mr. Aniket Vagal, learned Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Pandurang H. Gaikwad, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

30th JULY 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Ms. Savvy Kolhekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Pandurang Gaikwad, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

2.

Notice was issued to the State/Respondent on 4th July 2025. 3.

Mr. Pandurang Gaikwad, learned A.P.P. appears on behalf of the State/Respondent and submits that amongst other offences, the offences charged are under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999, as such the prosecution requires time to file reply. Reply to be filed within a period of two weeks from today. 4.

Ms. Savvy Kolhekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is seeking bail on the ground of long incarceration and also on the ground of parity. She submits that Gitalaxmi

904-BA-2599-2025.doc Accused No. 3-Vinayak Vinod Shrivastav, who is similarly placed like the Applicant, has been released on bail, as such the ground of parity.

5.

At the request of Mr. Pandurang Gaikwad, learned A.P.P. and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 20th August 2025. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.07.30 20:10:04 +0530 Gitalaxmi