Haider Javed Sayyad @ Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra

by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date:

2025.09.04 21:04:08 +0530 ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR 904.BA2599.2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2599 OF 2025 Haider Javed Sayyad @ Shaikh.

...Applicant.

Versus

State of Maharashtra.

...Respondent.

Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATED: 4th SEPTEMBER, 2025.

PC:- 1.

Mr. Aniket Vagal, learned Advocate for the Applicant has advanced arguments.

2.

Mr. Gaikwad, learned APP after having canvassed argument, requests for a short accommodation to take further instructions from the Investigating Officer. He requests for listing of the matter on 8th September, 2025. 3.

Adjournment not objected to by the Mr. Aniket Vagal, learned Advocate for the Applicant.

4.

At the request of Mr. Gaikwad, learned APP and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 8th September, 2025. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE,J.) Talwalkar