Pratibha Yogesh Saindane v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

4-BA-3179-2025.doc IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI Date:

2025.08.13 21:34:52 +0530 GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3179 OF 2025 Mrs. Pratibha Yogesh Saindane .. Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

Mr. Rishikesh Sharma, learned Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, learned APP for the Respondent-State. ...................

CORAM

: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE : 12th AUGUST, 2025.

P.C.

:

1. Mr. Rishikesh Sharma, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits that the case of the prosecution is entirely based on circumstantial evidence. He submits that initially an unnatural death was registered, however, subsequently an offence under Section 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC was registered. He submits that there is no material to implicate the Applicant in the present crime. He submits that the Applicant along with her infant child of 17 months is with her in jail.

2.

Issue notice to Respondent.

3.

Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, learned APP for the State appears and waives service.

4-BA-3179-2025.doc 4.

Considering the fact that an infant is suffering incarceration, Mr. Rishikesh Sharma requests for an early date.

5.

At the request of Mr. Rishikesh Sharma, learned Advocate for the Applicant and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 20th August, 2025.

[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.]