Gautam Ramanand Rai v. State Of Maharashtra

2-BA-3213-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3213 OF 2025 Gautam Ramanand Rai ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

__________ Mr. Kishan Chaudhari, learned Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

14th AUGUST 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Kishan Chaudhari, learned Advocate for the Applicant. He craves leave to amend the memo of present Bail Application. He submits that certain grounds are wrongly raised in the memo, which needs to be deleted. He submits that some points, which are relevant for adjudication of the present Bail Application needs to be added. Leave granted. He prays for 3 weeks time to carry out said amendment. Time granted. 2.

Amendment to be carried out within stipulated time. 3.

Not objected to by Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

4.

At the request of Mr. Kishan Chaudhari, learned Advocate for the Applicant, list the matter on 10th September 2025. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] Gitalaxmi by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date:

2025.08.18 14:35:51 +0530 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR